Entry tags:
w00bie?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I come back to the abuse thing: House is an abuse victim, and despite all of his personal quirks, characteristics and failings, he will be an abuse victim until the day he dies. Worse yet, he was a childhood abuse victim, and one that has not yet dealt with and moved past those issues (and I suspect never will). Since an abused child has no "out" of the abuse, they learn to live with it and feel trapped. That is why House will not actually end his association with Cuddy: she has him pretty much convinced that he "belongs there."
...
All I'm saying is that when dealing specifically with Cuddy, I think a lot of his actions are reactions to her manipulations and unpredictable actions and due to his past background, he does not realize that he can leave.
This is really interesting. This particular view of an abusive relationship between House and Cuddy seems to have become popular after 'The Greater Good', wherein Cuddy forgot about social niceties and brought out her claws (and I say this recognising the assholeishness of House's behaviour in the previous episodes; I said everything I had to say about this here, and I stand by it). But what's really interesting is that such fannish views now tie up this episode to the Tritter arc and 'Detox', where Cuddy's (and Wilson's) actions, fall on the morally ambiguous terrain, precisely because on one hand they are manipulative and uncalled for, and on the other hand they serve to highlight House's possible misuse of a drug he is genuinely dependent on. And then they tie it up to House's relationship with his father, and whatever brand of harsh disciplining he underwent in his hands. Canon does not tell us the *degree* of 'abuse' House suffered, but for these fans, it is enough abuse to have permanently scarred
That said, if the Cult of House becomes anything like the Cult of Spike, I'm keeping my sporks handy.
no subject
Well, that's the difference. Being a victim of something does not excuse one from responsibility for one's own actions. This martyr!House attitude severely downplays the responsibility part.
no subject