why so gay?
Jun. 23rd, 2009 10:46 amIf you are 'squicked' by m/m pr0n, you should probably not be READING m/f/m threesomes. *headdesk*
This is especially irritating in the context of the typical 'straight guy' threesomes in the mainstream, where two men 'take' a woman together and are still not even a little bit gay, oh no, because they're just having sex with her, not each other. I would rather be spared that in fandom, thank you very much.
This is especially irritating in the context of the typical 'straight guy' threesomes in the mainstream, where two men 'take' a woman together and are still not even a little bit gay, oh no, because they're just having sex with her, not each other. I would rather be spared that in fandom, thank you very much.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 09:57 am (UTC)Wow, I'm missing stuff.
(bet they weren't cowboys ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 12:28 pm (UTC)Yes. There is, er, a lot of porn - both written as well as visual - that involves two guys 'taking' a woman, and 'pleasuring' her in every possible way. It's supposed to be about male bonding and a heterosexual woman's ultimate fantasy. Sometimes, they are even cowboys...
(There was this one pr0n movie where a hot and sweaty God was having a threesome with two of his female angels. Yes, I have a lot of guy friends and some girl friends who like mainstream pornography, and who feel that it is absolutely necessary to share. While I don't find them hot in the least, it *is* very entertaining if you're watching it in the right frame of mind.)
(I have already shared too much information, haven't I?)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 12:35 pm (UTC)Interesting definition of gay, that that kind of male bonding doesn't fit into it, though. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 12:46 pm (UTC)Interesting definition of gay, that that kind of male bonding doesn't fit into it, though. ;)
But there is always girl!kissing if it's a f/f/m threesome, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 12:55 pm (UTC)I want to write a foursome one day f/f/m/m. The logistics of that would be a *lot* of fun! ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 12:59 pm (UTC)I think I've read a few foursomes in fandom, but mostly the logistics make my head hurt.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-23 01:06 pm (UTC)The thing I can't quite get past is the rationale of *why* they'd go for a foursome. My m/m and f/f would be having too much fun on their own, I think, to be distracted by the other pair.