Why, why, why?
Jan. 23rd, 2005 10:35 pmAm I the only person who finds the concept of burning a book simply horrifying? Maybe it's because my books don't even get touched with a pen (pencil when I need it), unless it's for writing down my name (and I hate doing that too); maybe it's because I've had too many encounters with torn and defaced library books - but this is just... *is speechless*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:33 am (UTC)I couldn't do that. Even to a book I hated. I find it equally awful.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 09:43 am (UTC)That said, my books are written in, commented on, in both pencil and pen.
Possibly it's because I teach--having notes in the books, ON the page, is often the difference between a so-so response and one that makes students think. I think mostly, though it is because I see books as dynamic, not static. They are a conversation between the writer and me, the reader. My notes are my reply--questions, comments, "see page so and so," etc. I don't see it as defacement, but as carrying on the medieval tradition of glossing a book.
Besides, I love opening a book I have not used for years, and finding on the flyleaf, below my name, a brief description of what I was doing that day. "The dog wants to play grrrr today." "It's been raining for a week, and the sun came out today!" "Dr. So and so made me buy this book. Says I'll be glad later." (I was!) And so on. I love finding books that my mother annotated--it's a conversation with her, years after her physical death.
That said, I would no more consider writing, even in pencil, in a library book than I would consider walking up and throwing mud at someone, just for fun.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 12:29 pm (UTC)Hey, been meaning to ask - does your F_W pseud *mean* anything?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:29 pm (UTC)Swatkat
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:34 pm (UTC)Possibly it's because I teach--having notes in the books, ON the page, is often the difference between a so-so response and one that makes students think. I think mostly, though it is because I see books as dynamic, not static. They are a conversation between the writer and me, the reader. My notes are my reply--questions, comments, "see page so and so," etc. I don't see it as defacement, but as carrying on the medieval tradition of glossing a book.
Oh, I understand. All my professors do the same thing, lol!
I love finding books that my mother annotated--it's a conversation with her, years after her physical death.
That's simply lovely. *g*
That said, I would no more consider writing, even in pencil, in a library book than I would consider walking up and throwing mud at someone, just for fun.
You will not believe the number of times I've used correction fluids in library books to make them look a tad respectable. And don't even get me started on tearing away pages. Why? Why do people do them, students, especially? Knowing that they won't need it ever again after a couple of years? And if they're too lazy to copy it down, there's a thing called the xerox machine, isn't there? [/rant]
Swatkat
no subject
Date: 2005-01-23 10:44 pm (UTC)My F_W pseud? It's not very interesting (unlike
Swatkat
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 02:54 am (UTC)Words still fail me.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 03:20 am (UTC)I used to work in a bookstore. We switched locations and annihilated a lot of stock in doing so. I was told to rip the covers and first few pages off of hundreds of books, becuase they were overstocked and couldn't be resold and couldn't be donated and the only thing to do was recycle them, but they couldn't be recycled unless the first few pages/cover were ripped off. My bosses, fortunately, were all book-lovers and understood immediately why my reaction was "Nooooo! I can't do that!"
I did though, in the end--because they also knew me well enough to hand me the true crime books first, and I just hated those.
But I still wibble thinking about all those books I mutilated. Even if they were going to be recycled into fresh, shiny books. Merf!!!
Anyway, back to book burning. Given how many people still do it seriously, I think it's unacceptable.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 08:49 am (UTC)Swatkat
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 08:50 am (UTC)Eeep! It must've been a very, very traumatic experience. *hugs*
Swatkat
I'm not sure if this is still there
Date: 2005-01-24 09:05 am (UTC)Nevertheless, that's probably fine with me, since I've no interest in watching someone burn books. That happens often enough in the world.
Being that I'm anal in regards to books, among other things...
Date: 2005-01-24 03:18 pm (UTC)I love the written word and cannot image ever burning or defacing a book in any way. I've a whole set of rules people must follow if they wish to borrow one of my books, and I've a rather large libary spread over two countries. I still grieve for the lose of my first copy of "Catch 22" which a certain person, who shall never be lent another book, lost six years, two months, and twelve days ago.
Btw, unrelated, but would you care to make me an icon for f_w. Something dark and snarky... *bg*
Re: I'm not sure if this is still there
Date: 2005-01-24 08:57 pm (UTC)Swatkat
Re: Being that I'm anal in regards to books, among other things...
Date: 2005-01-24 09:00 pm (UTC)I've a whole set of rules people must follow if they wish to borrow one of my books, and I've a rather large libary spread over two countries. I still grieve for the lose of my first copy of "Catch 22" which a certain person, who shall never be lent another book, lost six years, two months, and twelve days ago.
I think I'm too nice about lending my books. I've lost quite a few that way. I did well with the HP books, though - absolutely refused to lend them to anyone. *g*
An icon? Of course. Have any ideas?
Swatkat
Re: Being that I'm anal in regards to books, among other things...
Date: 2005-01-25 03:51 pm (UTC)Nothing can be made foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
Irony is the hygiene of the mind.
Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do.
"More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarrette."
from Radio ad circa 1948
As for picture I'm thinking either something morbid or disgustingly happy.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 12:36 am (UTC)Swatkat
Ooooooh!
Date: 2005-01-26 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 08:23 pm (UTC)